In the Financial Times (http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/4c38bfc4-92b3-11e1-b6e2-00144feab49a.html#axzz1u0KENQdr China stocks
battle the growth paradox) , was again an article that demonstrated good
economic growth is not always a good equity market. The most grateful example
for this is the Chinese market where since 2001 the equity market rose only 46%
while the value of the output as up almost five times.
In general I agree with the thesis that the
relation between the growth of the GDP and the stockmarket often is not that
good or not there at all, but one should not too automatically take that as a
certainty based on numerous scientific studies. Who could forecast well the
economic growth in the next two quarters in the US could have earned lots of
money with that in the previous few decades (more precisely: one should have
avoided big losses: when you see a recession arriving you have to get rid of
your equities).
The Chinese equity market is a difficult one with it’s
a and B shares where you as foreigner are a B investor. Insiders that know what
the government will do have a big advantage.
Wit IPO’s the prices are often way exaggerated
obeying to the wishes of government that places again and again more shares of
state companies. That continued dumping is also very bad for prices. So Joe
Sixpack is very disappointed about equities and prefers to make money with art,
porcelain, stamps etc. .
Government has dumped bad state companies at the
markets. Especially banks had to finance these loss making state companies with
lots of loans and so the banks were saddled with mountains of bad debt.
Because of the high GDP growth a lot has improved
for the banks. The state companies are more efficient now and there are now
more normal private companies at the market. So the quality of the Chinese
equity market is a lot better than before say 2000.
At the end of 2008 the Chinese government started to make
investing in equities more attractive again with lower transaction taxes etc.,
not only with high infrastructure investments. As investor one can better
believe the government (even more tha in the US don’t fight the FED) and so you
had to buy.
The chart in the FT (http://im.media.ft.com/content/images/13065c62-92f3-11e1-b6e2-00144feab49a.imgc) suggests
that the Chinese government thinks share prices are too low and that they want
action, less insider trading etc. and the Peoples Bank of China will of course
follow suit. Especially when you believe China has a soft landing you should
maybe obey again to the Chinese government and buy Chinese equities!
No comments:
Post a Comment